Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs Research Articles

Regionalization of Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs: One Trauma Center Cannot Do It Alone

Regionalization of Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs: One Trauma Center Cannot Do It Alone

Examining adverse childhood experiences and Black youth's engagement in a hospital-based violence intervention program using administrative data.

Stemming from poverty and systemic racism, Black youth are disproportionately represented in hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) due to greater violence exposure. HVIPs are a critical intervention that have been shown to reduce rates of reinjury in urban hospitals and trauma centers across the United States; however, they are plagued by low enrollment and engagement rates. Few studies have examined factors related to engagement, particularly among Black youth. Guided by Trauma Theory and Critical Race Theory, this study uses a retrospective cohort design. Between-group differences of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among engaged youth compared to nonengaged youth who were violently injured and recruited for a HVIP were examined using chi-square and logistic regression. ACEs were approximated using a novel approach with administrative data. Results indicated that the total ACE score was not significantly associated with engagement status. Individual ACEs were tested across age groups. This study highlights a novel approach to understanding ACEs among a hard-to-reach population and illuminates the significant level of ACEs faced by violence-exposed Black youth at young ages. Considering theory, Black families may be more reluctant to engage due to fear and past harms in social service systems stemming from systemic racism. Though ACEs did not predict engagement in this study, considering the high rates of ACEs experienced by Black youth and their families in the context of systemic racism suggests that HVIPs should acknowledge historical harms and foster trauma-informed and healing-centered interactions during recruitment and later stages of engagement.

Integration of Medical Legal Services into a Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program: A Survey and Interview-Based Provider Needs Assessment.

Violent injury among trauma surgery patients is strongly associated with exposure to harmful social determinants of health and negative long-term health outcomes. Medical-legal partnerships in other settings successfully provide patients with legal services to address similar health-harming legal needs and may offer a promising model for the care of violently-injured patients. An electronic survey tool was distributed to clinicians and staff affiliated with the hospital-based violence intervention program at a single urban level one trauma center. Semi-structured follow up interviews were conducted with participants, and interviews were coded using thematic analysis and grounded theory. Participants reported many health-harming legal needs among their violently injured patients. The most commonly-identified needs were: health insurance denials (62.5%); difficulty accessing crime victims compensation funds (56.3%); trouble accessing official documents (50%); and problems with non-SSDI public benefits (50%). Participants reported inconsistent methods for learning about and responding to patients' health-harming legal needs. The most common barriers to addressing these needs included: lack of awareness that a lawyer could help with the issue (68.8%); prioritization of other needs (68.8%); previous negative legal experiences (62.5%); and cost (62.5%). Identified needs encompass issues traditionally-addressed by MLPs as well as more novel challenges faced by violent injury survivors. This survey and interview-based study identifies complex health-harming legal needs present among violently-injured trauma surgery patients. Medical-legal partnerships specially-designed for the setting of violent injury appear well-suited to meet these needs, potentially reducing risk of violent re-injury, long-term negative health outcomes, and healthcare system costs. Level IV / Prognostic and Epidemiological.

When Equality Is Not Equity: The Ethics of Access to Trauma Care A Surgical Perspective.

The purpose of this surgical perspective is to describe the trauma care needs of the South Side of Chicago and the creation of an adult trauma center at the University of Chicago Medicine and associated hospital-based violence intervention program. Traumatic injury is a leading cause of death and disability in the US. Disparities across the continuum of trauma care exist, which are often rooted in the social determinants of health. Trauma center distribution is critical to timely treatment and should be based on the trauma needs of the area. The previous trauma ecosystem of Chicago was incongruent with the concentration of violent injuries on the south and west sides of the city leading to a fallacy of distributive justice. A descriptive analysis of community partners, trauma program leadership, trauma surgeons and the violence intervention program director was performed. The UCM trauma center opened in May 2018 and has since been one of the busiest trauma centers in the country with a 40% penetrating trauma rate. There have been significant reductions in patient transport time on the South Side up to 8.9 minutes (P<0.001). The violence intervention program employs credible messengers with lived experience representing the community and has engaged over 8000 patients since 2018 developing both community-based and medical legal partnerships. The persistent efforts of the community and key stakeholders led to a system change improving trauma care for the South Side of Chicago.

Improved follow-up care for gun violence survivors in the Trauma Quality of Life Clinic

BackgroundOutpatient follow-up represents a crucial opportunity to re-engage with gun violence survivors (GVS) and to facilitate positive health outcomes. Current outpatient models for firearm-related injuries and trauma care are inconsistent...

Protect and Provide: Perceptions of Manhood and Masculinities Among Disabled Violently Injured Black Men in a Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program.

Exploring the post-injury lives of those who have survived gunshot wounds is essential to understanding the entire scope of firearm violence. The lives of Black male firearm violence survivors are transformed in various ways due to their injuries both visible and invisible. This study explored how Black men who suffer from disabilities via a firearm negotiated their masculine identities. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 violently injured Black men participating in a hospital-based violence intervention program. Survivors expressed their thoughts on how their injuries impacted their manhood and masculinities. Three themes emerged: (1) perceptions of manhood, (2) loss of independence and burden on others, and (3) and mobility. These themes highlighted and described how their lives were impacted post-injury and characterized their psychological and physical experience of recovery. The research findings suggest the need for more qualitative studies to further explore the relationship between firearm injury, Black masculinity, and perceptions of manhood. While Black men are understudied in health research and invisible in disability research, they continue to be hyper-invisible when discussing violently acquired disabilities.

Assessing Risk Factors for Victims of Violence in a Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program

Assessing Risk Factors for Victims of Violence in a Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program

Assessing Risk Factors for Victims of Violence in a Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program

Introduction: Personal, behavioral, and environmental risk factors are correlated to varying degrees with each other and with the overall likelihood of violent reinjury. When used with fidelity, risk assessment instruments, including the violence reinjury risk assessment instrument (VRRAI), identify domains in which individuals present elevated risk levels to aid in matching services with needs. Less is known about the collinearity among risk factors for violently injured individuals admitted to hospitals. Collinearity between risk factors has ramifications for predictive modeling of violent reinjury risk. The objective of this study was to identify significantly correlated risk factors when the VRRAI was used by hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIP) for clients. Materials and Methods: Victims of violent injury by modality of firearm, stabbing, and physical assault who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center at a single institution were voluntarily enrolled in a hospital-based violence intervention program (HVIP) between September 2020 and June 2022. Violence intervention specialists (VIS) completed the VRRAI within the first month of participant enrollment. The VRRAI is comprised of 29 binary indicators that may signal elevated risk of violent reinjury. Data from completed assessments were used to apply risk-need-responsivity (RNR) principles along with phi coefficients of key indicators to examine overlap and prevalence in the population. Results: A total of 98 participants were enrolled in the HVIP. The median age was 27 years old and 79 (80.6%) were male, while 66 (67.3%) were non-Hispanic Black or African American, 9 (9.2%) were non-Hispanic White, and 17 (17.3%) identified as Hispanic or Latino. Several statistically significant relationships existed between key risk indicators in the VRRAI. Importantly, a robust relationship was found between the two dynamic risk factors of having heavy connection with gangs and a perception of imminent threat of violence (φc = 0.57, p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: Data suggest that some variables could be consolidated or removed from the VRRAI to create an even shorter instrument that can be performed more rapidly in the clinical setting. The application of the RNR model illustrates a limited number of dynamic risk factors that could be immediately addressed as part of case management should be prioritized among the questions selected from the VRRAI for inquiry at the intake assessment.

Implementation of an emerging hospital-based violence intervention program: a multimethod study

BackgroundIndividuals who experience assaultive firearm injury are at elevated risk for violent reinjury and multiple negative physical and psychological health outcomes. Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) may improve patient outcomes...

Addressing Legal Needs as Violence Prevention: A National Survey of Legal Services Offered through Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs

Abstract: Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) provide comprehensive services to survivors of community violence to address social determinants of health (SDOH) as risks factors for future violence. Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) integrate lawyers into health care teams to address SDOH through the application of the law. Despite shared purposes, it is unknown if HVIP-MLPs exist. We sought to quantify the existing landscape of legal services provided by HVIPs, identify HVIP-MLPs, and characterize barriers to formation. Surveys and interviews were conducted in 2020 with 35 HVIPs of the Health Alliance for Violence Intervention (HAVI) concerning civil legal services. Most HVIPs screened for civil legal needs though none had an official MLP. Common civil legal needs included housing, mental health, and education. Barriers included no memorandum of understanding, legal confusion, funding, and overwhelming need. In 2021, no HVIP-MLP partnerships existed within HAVI. Establishing HVIP-MLPs may further support survivors of violence and address health inequity.

Incidence of and Factors Associated With Recurrent Firearm Injury Among Patients Presenting to St. Louis Trauma Centers, 2010 to 2019 : A Cohort Study.

Firearm injuries are a public health crisis in the United States. To examine the incidence and factors associated with recurrent firearm injuries and death among patients presenting with an acute (index), nonfatal firearm injury. Multicenter, observational, cohort study. Four adult and pediatric level I trauma hospitals in St. Louis, Missouri, 2010 to 2019. Consecutive adult and pediatric patients (n = 9553) presenting to a participating hospital with a nonfatal acute firearm injury. Data on firearm-injured patient demographics, hospital and diagnostic information, health insurance status, and death were collected from the St. Louis Region-Wide Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program Data Repository. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index was used to characterize the social vulnerability of the census tracts of patients' residences. Analysis included descriptive statistics and time-to-event analyses estimating the probability of experiencing a recurrent firearm injury. We identified 10 293 acutely firearm-injured patients of whom 9553 survived the injury and comprised the analytic sample. Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years (IQR, 1.5 to 6.4 years), 1155 patients experienced a recurrent firearm injury including 5 firearm suicides and 149 fatal firearm injuries. Persons experiencing recurrent firearm injury were young (25.3 ± 9.5 years), predominantly male (93%), Black (96%), and uninsured (50%), and resided in high social vulnerability regions (65%). The estimated risk for firearm reinjury was 7% at 1 year and 17% at 8 years. Limited data on comorbidities and patient-level social determinants of health. Inability to account for recurrent injuries presenting to nonstudy hospitals. Recurrent injury and death are frequent among survivors of firearm injury, particularly among patients from socially vulnerable areas. Our findings highlight the need for interventions to prevent recurrence. Emergency Medicine Foundation-AFFIRM and Missouri Foundation for Health.

The gap between hospital-based violence intervention services and client needs: A systematic review

BackgroundSurvivors of intentional interpersonal violence face social challenges related to social determinants of health that led to their initial injury. Hospital-based violence intervention programs reduce reinjury. It is unclear how well they meet clients’ reported needs. This systematic review aimed to quantify how well hospital-based violence intervention program services addressed clients’ reported needs. MethodsMedline, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and PsycInfo were queried for studies addressing hospital-based violence intervention programs services and intentional injury survivors’ needs in the United States. Case reports, reviews, editorials, theses, and studies focusing on pediatric patients, victims of intimate partner violence, or sexual assault were excluded. Data extracted included program structure, hospital-based violence intervention program services, and client needs assessments before and after receiving hospital-based violence intervention program services. ResultsOf the 3,339 citations identified, 13 articles were selected for inclusion. Hospital-based violence intervention programs clients’ most reported needs included mental health (10 studies), employment (7), and education (5) before receiving hospital-based violence intervention programs services. Only 4 studies conducted quantitative client needs assessments before and after receiving hospital-based violence intervention program services. All 4 studies were able to meet at least 50% of each of the clients’ reported needs. The success rate depended on the need and program location: success in meeting mental health needs ranged from 65% to 90% of clients. Conversely, time-intensive long-term needs were least met, including employment 60% to 86% of clients, education 47% to 73%, and housing 50% to 71%. ConclusionFew hospital-based violence intervention programs studies considered clients’ reported needs. Employment, education, and housing must be a stronger focus of hospital-based violence intervention programs.

Implementing a hospital-based violence intervention program for assault-injured youth: implications for social work practice

ABSTRACT Youth in the U.S. experience a high rate of assault-related injuries resulting in physical, psychological and social sequelae that require a wide range of services after discharge from the hospital. Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIP’s) have been developed to engage youth in services designed to reduce the incidence of violent injury in young people. HVIP’s combine the efforts of medical staff with community-based partners to provide trauma-informed care to violently-injured people and have been found to be a cost-effective means to reduce re-injury rates and improve social and behavioral health outcomes. Few studies have explored the organizational and community level factors that impact implementation of these important and complex interventions. The objective of this study was to develop an in-depth understanding of the factors that impact HVIP implementation from the perspectives of 41 stakeholders through qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis generated three themes that included the importance of integrated, collaborative care, the need for providers who can perform multiple service roles and deploy a range of skills, and the importance of engaging clients through extended contact. In this article we explore these themes and their implications for healthcare social work.

The Proliferation of Hospital-Based Violence-Intervention Programs in North Carolina

Hospital-based violence intervention programs provide an example of the multifaceted approach needed to address violence as a public health issue. In North Carolina, several health care systems have joined the call to create programs that address the needs of victims of violence and promote the healing process.

Firearm injury survival is only the beginning: The impact of socioeconomic factors on unplanned readmission after injury

BackgroundFirearm trauma remain a national crisis disproportionally impacting minority populations in the United States. Risk factors leading to unplanned readmission after firearm injury remain unclear. We hypothesized that socioeconomic factors have a major impact on unplanned readmission following assault-related firearm injury. MethodsThe 2016–2019 Nationwide Readmission Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify hospital admissions in those aged >14 years with assault-related firearm injury. Multivariable analysis assessed factors associated with unplanned 90-day readmission. ResultsOver 4 years, 20,666 assault-related firearm injury admissions were identified that resulted in 2,033 injuries with subsequent 90-day unplanned readmission. Those with readmissions tended to be older (31.9 vs 30.3 years), had a drug or alcohol diagnosis at primary hospitalization (27.1% vs 24.1%), and had longer hospital stays at primary hospitalization (15.5 vs 8.1 days) [all P<0.05]. The mortality rate in the primary hospitalization was 4.5%. Primary readmission diagnoses included: complications (29.6%), infection (14.5%), mental health (4.4%), trauma (15.6%), and chronic disease (30.6%). Over half of the patients readmitted with a trauma diagnosis were coded as new trauma encounters. 10.3% of readmission diagnoses included an additional ‘initial’ firearm injury diagnosis. Independent predictors of 90-day unplanned readmission were public insurance (aOR 1.21, P = 0.008), lowest income quartile (aOR 1.23, P = 0.048), living in a larger urban region (aOR 1.49, P = 0.01), discharge requiring additional care (aOR 1.61, P < 0.001), and discharge against medical advice (aOR 2.39, P < 0.001). ConclusionsHere we present socioeconomic risk factors for unplanned readmission after assault-related firearm injury. Better understanding of this population can lead to improved outcomes, decreased readmissions, and decreased financial burden on hospitals and patients. Hospital-based violence intervention programs may use this to target mitigating intervention programs in this population.

Using grounded theory to develop a theory of change for a violence intervention program

Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIP) are critical to interrupting the cycle of violence. These interventions are considered “complex” in that they have many mechanisms of change and related outcomes. Few HVIPs clearly identify the underlying mechanisms of intervention and explicitly link those with key outcomes however, limiting the field’s ability to know what works best and for whom. To develop a program theory of change for these “complex interventions,” a non-linear, robust methodology that is grounded in the lived experience of those delivering and receiving services is needed. To aid researchers, evaluators, students, and program developers, we describe the use of Grounded Theory as a methodology to enhance the development of complex interventions, illuminating a non-linear approach that engages key stakeholders. To illustrate application, we describe a case example of The Antifragility Initiative, a HVIP in Cleveland, Ohio. The development of the program theory of change was conducted in four phases: (1) review of existing program documents, (2) semi-structured interviews with program developers (n = 6), (3) a focus group with program stakeholders (n = 8), and (4) interviews with caregivers and youth (n = 8). Each phase informed the next and culminated in a theoretical narrative and visual model of the Antifragility Initiative. Together, the theoretical narrative and visual model identify the underlying mechanisms that can promote change by the program.

A Regional Approach to Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs Through LOV.

Community violence is an underaddressed public health threat. Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) have been used to address the root causes of violence and prevent reinjury. In this article, we describe the methodology of the St Louis Region-wide HVIP, Life Outside Violence (LOV) program, and provide preliminary process outcomes. Life Outside Violence mentors intervene following a violent injury to decrease risk of subsequent victimization and achieve goals unique to each participant by providing therapeutic counseling and case management services to patients and their families. Eligible patients are victims of violent injury between the ages of 8 and 24 years, who are residents of St Louis, Missouri, and present for care at a LOV partner adult or pediatric level I trauma hospital. Enrolled participants receive program services for 6 to 12 months and complete an individual treatment plan. In this article, we report LOV operational methodology, as well as process metrics, including program enrollment, graduation, and qualitative data on program implementation. From August 15, 2018, through April 30, 2022, 1750 LOV-eligible violently injured patients presented to a partner hospital, 349 were approached for program enrollment, and 206 consented to enroll in the program. During this pilot phase, 91 participants graduated from the LOV program and have process output data available for analysis. Life Outside Violence has been implemented into clinical practice as the first HVIP to influence across an entire region through partnership with multiple university and hospital systems. It is our hope that methods shared in this article will serve as a primer for organizations hoping to implement and expand HVIPs to interrupt community violence at the regional level.

148 A Feasibility Study for the Implementation of a Hospital-based Violence Intervention Program in the Rural South

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: As hospitals across the nation respond to the need to address community violence, there is a dearth of Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs (HVIPs) in the South despite having disproportionate rates. This research aims to identify key factors and strategies for implementation of an HVIP among rural patient populations in a southern state. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with medical providers, social service organizations, and patients transferred from four high-risk rural areas in Arkansas. Data will be analyzed using Framework Analysis, a rapid analysis approach involving framework development, code application, impactful statement identification, and content analysis. Evidence- Based Quality Improvement (EBQI), a group consensus making process, will be conducted to identify key implementation strategies and factors to adapt based interview findings. Priority areas for adaptation will be identified via systematic rating. The EBQI team, including researchers and key rural stakeholders will engage in a series of discussion, vote on final strategies, and develop a guide for future HVIP implementation and pilot testing. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Findings from this study will result in a prioritized list of barriers and facilitators across sample groups. Factors will be rated by level of importance. Cluster maps will display the relationships among factors. Go and no-go zones will be identified based on importance and feasibility. Implementation strategies will be mapped to barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The findings will result in a culturally and geographically relevant HVIP model and package of implementation strategies to test in future hybrid trials (feasibility pilot &amp; multi-site RCT); and shape the future of violence prevention efforts in healthcare settings across the rural South.

Strengthening Doctor-Patient Relationships Through Hospital-Based Violence Interventions.

Violence in Chicago has been persistently high in low-income communities of color. Recent attention has focused on how structural inequities weaken protective factors that help keep communities healthy and safe. Spikes in community violence seen in Chicago since the COVID-19 pandemic further expose the lack of social service, health care, economic, and political safety nets in low-income communities and the apparent dearth of faith in those systems. The authors contend that a comprehensive, collaborative approach to violence prevention that prioritizes treatment and community partnerships is needed to address social determinants of health and structural characteristics that often provide the context for interpersonal violence. One strategy to address decreasing faith in systems like hospitals is foregrounding frontline paraprofessional prevention workers who possess cultural capital based on their experiences navigating interpersonal and structural violence. Hospital-based violence intervention programs help professionalize these prevention workers by providing a framework for patient-centered crisis intervention and assertive case management. The authors describe how the Violence Recovery Program (VRP), a multidisciplinary hospital-based violence intervention model, leverages the cultural capital of credible messengers to use teachable moments to promote trauma-informed care to violently injured patients, assess their immediate risk for reinjury and retaliation, and connect them to wrap-around services to help aid comprehensive recovery. Violence recovery specialists have engaged over 6,000 victims of violence since the program's launch in 2018. Three-quarters of patients expressed social determinants of health needs. Over the past year, specialists have connected over one-third of engaged patients to mental health referrals and community-based social services. High violence rates in Chicago limited case management opportunities in the emergency room. In fall 2022, the VRP began to establish collaborative agreements with community-based street outreach programs and medical-legal partnerships to address structural determinants of health.

Developing practices for hospital-based violence intervention programs to address anti-Black racism and historical trauma.

To promote health equity among Black youth exposed to community violence, it is critical that psychologists partner with other health care professionals and communities with lived experience to explicitly address anti-Black racism and historical trauma as fundamental contributors to violence-related health inequities. This article describes our community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to develop practices for hospital-based violence intervention programs that mitigate violence-related health inequities among Black youth. Current conceptualizations of trauma-related symptoms among Black youth exposed to community violence often fail to consider the role of anti-Black racism and historical trauma in creating and maintaining traumatic stress. Our CBPR formative studies highlight the importance of and priorities to address community violence within the context of anti-Black racism and historical trauma. In describing our process and developed tools and practices, we aim to highlight the important contributions psychologists can make through interdisciplinary and community partnerships to advance health equity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).